Legal Opinion
Grace Line, Inc. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
The sufficiency of the answer filed by the United States of America, as respondent, is challenged by the exceptions and exceptive allegations of libelant and its motion for a decree pro confesso on the pleadings, Rule 27 of the General Admiralty Rules, 28 U.S.C.A.
The libel is for freight earned on various shipments of ore carried under bills of lading by libelant for General Services Administration from ports of South America to New York on several of libelant’s vessels.
Respondent’s answer, as originally filed, included certain set-offs which have since been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Yonkers Hamilton Sanitarium Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- United States v. Yale Transport Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- In Re Norsal Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. Framen Steel Supply Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.