Hibbard v. Halliday
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by.John S. Halliday-against Harry Hibbard. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant -brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This was an action for damages, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, défendant below. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, to reverse which this proceeding in error .was commenced. Hereafter the parties will be designated as “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
It seems that the parties to this action are owners of adjoining lots situated on Okmulgee avenue, in the city of Muskogee. During the summer and fall of 1908, the plaintiff completed a flat on his lots consisting of eight…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Rideout v. KnoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Burke v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Flaherty v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Barger v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Hornsby v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Sundowner, Inc. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Erickson v. HudsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Cohen Et Ux. v. Perrino Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.