Silas v. State

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction, after trial by jury, of armed robbery, contending that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress his oral statements and in giving a certain instruction to the jury. We affirm.

After appellant was arrested and taken to the police station, Detective Hill of the Sheriff’s office, read him the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Appellant asked to speak with Ellis Dean, an agent for the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency, whom appellant had been assisting as an informant. Hill…