Legal Opinion
State v. Oyarzo
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 21, 1973No. 42087PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
274 So.2d 519 (1973)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Crispitano OYARZO Oyarzo, Respondent.
No. 42087.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 21, 1973.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 1973.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.
BOYD, Justice.
This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, reported at 257 So.2d 108. The decision sought to be reviewed conflicts with Rhome v. State,[1] giving this Court jurisdiction under § 4,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paramore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Milton v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Rhome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Denmark v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Palmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Halliwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Palmes v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Cannady v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.