Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Sanzone
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: This being a condemnation proceeding as distinguished from an appropriation case, the power of the court to review the award of the Commissioners is strictly limited (City of Niagara Falls v New York Cent. R. R. Co., 31 AD2d 780). In Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v Harkins (40 AD2d 1075, mot for lv to app den 31 NY2d 648), we reaffirmed the limited judicial review authority in such proceedings, observing that: "The court cannot modify but must either confirm the report or reject it for irregularities in the proceeding, or because it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Dodge v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. HarkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- City of Niagara Falls v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- County of Niagara v. BagwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Village of Hilton v. EdelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981