Legal Opinion

Couch v. Couch

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 13, 1951PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P. J.

The complainant, Wallace Owen Cawood Couch, was born out of wedlock. The late Wiley, 0. Couch was his father, and Anna B. Cawood, who later became Mrs W. C. Prendergast, is his mother. Mr. Couch died testate and by his will bestowed his entire estate upon others without mentioning the complainant. By this bill the latter claims a right to participate in the estate. The record presents two theories for the claim; (1) that complainant was not only the natural son of Mr. Couch, but after the making of the latter’s will became an adopted son by virtue of a contract between his father and his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Chehak v. BattlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. In re KnottTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Melton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  5. Wallace v. RappleyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lanier v. RainsTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bridges v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Real Estate Management, Inc. v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. E. K. Hardison Seed Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API