Legal Opinion

Wolf v. CENTRAL OREGON & PACIFIC RAILROAD

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 2009No. 05CV4330CC; A136347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal following the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs, who are owners of real property in Douglas County, Oregon (the Wolf property), brought this action against defendant, claiming a prescriptive easement that would allow them to continue to use the private crossing over defendant’s railroad tracks that intersect their land. They also sought damages they alleged had resulted from defendant’s removal of the paved surface of the existing private crossing. The trial court granted summary judgment in defendant’s favor based on its conclusions…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Co. v. BarroisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Girard v. Youngstown Belt Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Nelson v. Montana RailMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State v. OidorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Thornburgh v. CyrusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API