Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Markley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1985No. 301PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This appeal is from an order dismissing appellant’s P.C. H.A. petition on grounds that it became moot after he had served the sentence imposed. We conclude that the requested relief is not moot and reverse.

George Markley, represented by an assistant public defender, was tried by jury and found guilty of three counts of theft by deception and one count of issuing a bad check. Post-trial motions were filed, but they were dismissed by the trial court. On March 28, 1983, prior to sentencing, Markley requested that his trial counsel be removed and new counsel appointed. On April 4,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Com. v. Coniker, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Thomas v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. BerthesiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API