Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hayes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1991PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue before the en banc court is whether the interpretation of the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA)1 announced by this court in Commonwealth v. Pierce, 397 Pa.Super. 126, 579 A.2d 963 (1990), should be overruled. Upon a complete review of the PCRA, we hold that under section 9543(a) of the PCRA the Pennsylvania legislature clearly provided that individuals must be presently serving a sentence of imprisonment, probation or parole at the time they file a PCRA petition in order to be eligible for relief. We therefore conclude Pierce was correctly decided. In the instant case we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AhlbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Wayne Paul Burkett v. William Love, Superintendent, Answering Blair County District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. PlunkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. AhlbornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API