Shear v. City of Wayne Civil Serv. Comm.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals 644 21 NEBRASKA APPELLATE REPORTS As stated above, delay, alone, is an insufficient reason to deny a motion for leave to amend a pleading. Since defendants failed to show they would be unduly prejudiced if the amend- ment were granted, the trial court abused its discretion in disal- lowing it. Having found that the district court should have allowed the amendment in 2010, we need not address plaintiffs’ remaining assignments of error. CONCLUSION We find that the district court abused its discretion in deny- ing plaintiffs’ motion to amend the first…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Toby J. Sutton v. Patricia BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Barnett v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Martin v. Nebraska Department of Public InstitutionsNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
- Parent v. CITY OF BELLEVUE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009