Legal Opinion

Barnett v. City of Scottsbluff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2004No. S-03-702PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

I. NATURE OF CASE

Tom Barnett’s employment with the City of Scottsbluff, Nebraska, was terminated pursuant to the decision of the Scottsbluff city manager, Rick Kuckkahn. The termination resulted from Barnett’s erroneous claim that he had attended an educational conference in Kearney, Nebraska. In accordance with the city’s personnel manual, Barnett requested and was granted a hearing to challenge his termination of employment (formal hearing). The formal hearing was conducted before Kuckkahn on December 18 and 24, 2002. The formal hearing was transcribed. Witnesses testified under oath and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hass v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dowd v. First Omaha Securities Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seldin v. Estate of SilvermanNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. McNally v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pierce v. DOUGLAS CTY. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. JCB Enterprises, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hickey v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Douglas Cty.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API