Legal Opinion

Muncey v. Sun Insurance Office

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Iosco; Simpson, J. Garnishment proceedings by Angelina Smith Muncey against the Sun Insurance Office, as garnishee of Henry Boutyette, in which proceeding Caspar M. Zengerle intervened under claim of title to the fund. From a judgment for plaintiff, the garnishee and the intervener bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff instituted proceedings in garnishment against the Sun Insurance Office, and disclosure was filed, showing that the insurance company was indebted to the principal defendant in the sum of 1480, unless Caspar M. Zengerle was entitled to the claim under an assignment made to him of the same, but stated that'such an assignment had been made, and that, therefore, the insurance company was not indebted to the principal defendant. By an order of the court, Zengerle and O. E. MOutcheon and M. J. Oonnine were permitted to intervene as claimants to the fund involved. On the trial the claims…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blanchard v. MoorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Metz Manf'g Co. v. HolbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hayes v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ferry v. Cincinnati UnderwritersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Nachtegall v. ReilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API