Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Queen Insurance Co. of America

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Assumpsit by Charles L. Jacobs and Alexander Friedman, copartners as Jacobs & Friedman, against the Queen Insurance Company of America upon a policy of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. When here before a full statement of the essential facts was made, and will be found reported in 188 Mich., at page 512 (150 N. W. 147).

Upon the first trial a verdict was directed for the plaintiffs, the court leaving to the jury merely- the question of damages. In this court the judgment was reversed and the- case sent back for a new trial, because of error in the failure of the trial court to submit to the jury the question whether the membership of Harry Friedenberg in the firm of D. Littman & Co. had been fraudulently concealed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lent v. . ShearNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. McNees v. Southern InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Schrepfer v. Rockford InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. In Re WeissmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. People v. WinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API