State v. Saults
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant contends that the findings of fact made by the trial judge do not support his conclusion of law. We agree.
*322Findings of fact are binding and are conclusive on appeal when they are supported by competent evidence. State v. Stepney, 280 N.C. 306, 185 S.E. 2d 844 (1972); State v. Hedgebeth, 228 N.C. 259, 45 S.E. 2d 563 (1947), cert. dismissed, 334 U.S. 806 (1948). The findings of fact must support and justify the conclusion of law. State, ex rel. Glamorgan Pipe and Foundry Co. v. Benfield, 266 N.C. 342, 145 S.E. 2d 912 (1966).
Here, Judge Kirby’s findings of fact number…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . HedgebethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.