Legal Opinion

Tabour Realty Co. v. Gannon

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1926No. File No. 5345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BÍURCH, C.

This action arises out of a receivership which has resulted in much litigation. We give the facts in chronological order. The First National Bank of Aberdeen, having a mortgage on certain real estate belonging to' Emma A. Cranmer and her husband, S. H. Cranmer, commenced an action in the circuit court of Brown county to foreclose the mortgage. On the 2d day of *270May ,1916, said bank procured an order appointing defendant Fred H. Gannon receiver. Said receiver qualified, and gave a bond with the other defendants F. B. Gannon and Frank G. Suttle as sureties. Fie entered upon his duties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. State Central Savings Bank v. Fanning Ball-Bearing Chain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. First National Bank v. CranmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Veith v. RessNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Face v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arcon Construction Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lasell v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tabour Realty Co. v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API