Legal Opinion

Brodnax v. Steinhardt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 27, 1896No. 11,826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

A PPEAL from the Oivil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Monroe, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

■MilleR, J.

The plaintiffs sue for an amount claimed to be due under an agreement for the purchase and sale of grain, under which the plaintiffs were to buy, the defendants to take charge of the transportation and sale of the grain in Europe, and the profits on the sales to be divided. The suit for a specific sum was met by the exception that plaintiffs’ remedy was to sue for a settlement of the partnership. This resulted in an amended petition and a reference to accountants under defendants’ answer denying all liability and claiming a balance due by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. OakeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monroe Grocery Co. v. T. L. & M. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Haas v. S. Gumbel & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Levingston Supply Co. v. BassoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. J. C. Healy Co. v. BurglassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. W. K. Neckwear Co. v. RabinowitzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API