Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Mutual Trucking Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 1, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a corporation (hereinafter called Hartford), sued Mutual Trucking Company, a corporation, Hayden Truck Lines, Inc., a corporation, and Midwest Haulers, Inc., a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Mutual). Hartford’s amended statement of claim alleges that it issued two policies of insurance to Mutual through its general agent, Fred S. James & Co., a corporation (hereinafter called James); that Mutual admitted that after all adjustments there was a balance of $11,239.81 due from Mutual to Hartford; that Hartford and James both requested Mutual to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diversey Liquidating Corp. v. NeunkirchenIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Macks v. MacksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  3. Soelke v. Chicago Business Men's Racing Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JJ Brown Co., Inc. v. JL Simmons Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  2. 20 East Cedar Condominium Ass'n v. LusterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Cimino v. DillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Mutual Trucking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API