Legal Opinion

Diversey Liquidating Corp. v. Neunkirchen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1939No. 24934. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Earthing

Joseph Neunkirchen perfected a direct appeal to this court from an order of the municipal court of Chicago granting a motion of appellee for summary judgment against him for $2005.87 and costs. He also appealed from orders of the court dated June 24, 1938, and July 5, 1938, denying motions to vacate the aforesaid judgment. As grounds for his appeal he contends that paragraph 3 of rule hi of the revised civil practice rules of the municipal court is unconstitutional because it deprives him of his constitutional right to a jury trial, and of due process of law.

On December 21, 1937, the Diversey…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Peoples Wayne County Bank v. Wolverine Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hopkins v. LevandowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Precision Extrusions, Inc. v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Ray v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Belmar Drive-In Theatre Co. v. Illinois State Toll Highway CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Gliwa v. Washington Polish Loan & Building Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API