Legal Opinion

In Re Bernson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1917No. Crim. No. 580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It appears to the court that the imprisonment of the petitioner from which he seeks to be discharged was voluntarily submitted to by him for the purpose of presenting in this proceeding the question as to the validity of the order holding him to answer to the superior court for trial, and for that reason the remedy by habeas corpus should not be available to him.

Upon the authority of In re Gow, 139 Cal. 242, [73 P. 1451,Ex parte Schmitz, 150 Cal. 663, [89 P. 438], and Ex parteFord, 160 Cal. 334, [Ann. Cas. 1912D, 1267, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 882, 116 P. 757], it is ordered that the proceeding be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In Re GowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Ex Parte SchmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WellerArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. In Re BocciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API