Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Call

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1903No. 11,750PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Hamilton county: Samuel H. Sornborger, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, C.

At the former hearing the judgment in this case was affirmed, because there was no complaint of error in overruling a motion for new trial. A rehearing having been obtained, this defect in the petition in error has been remedied, and the case is before us for determination upon its merits.

It is a claim on behalf of the plaintiff Sharp of the right of contribution against the defendant Call upon a judgment, amounting to $616, paid by Sharp, recovered by one Wandell against Sharp, Evans and Stockham, on account of property of the Stockham Creamery Association, which had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Friend v. BurleighNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ingwersen Bros. v. EdgecombeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Tillson v. DowningNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Torpy v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Johnson v. TorpyNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Andromidas v. Theisen Bros.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
  3. Estate of Snook, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1897
  4. Malm v. StockNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API