Legal Opinion

Whillock v. Whillock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1976No. 48351PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This is an appeal by Arthur Faye Whil-lock, appellant, from judgment entered upon jury verdict finding him guilty of indirect contempt of court. Trial court sentenced him to serve one year in the Tulsa County jail. '

The record shows on November 5, 1973, appellant and his wife Mackie Joe Whil-lock, appellee, were granted a divorce in District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The decree required appellant to pay alimony in monthly installments of $400.00 each. The decree made further provision that alimony payments would terminate on death or remarriage of appellee.

On May 31,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Morgan v. National Bank of Commerce of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Hadley v. HadleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Ex Parte ThompsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Fields v. DrieselCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Sommer v. SommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Mellor v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Malnar v. WhitfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API