State v. Hickle
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
The question presented on this appeal is whether one who steals tires in Weston County, Wyoming, and brings them into Butte County, South Dakota, is subject to *827prosecution for larceny in the latter jurisdiction, and, if so, which state’s laws define the criminal character of the act.
Two Michelen tires, worth about $385.00, were stolen from a shop in Wyoming. They were identified by the owner at a service station in Belle Fourche, South Dakota. The service station owner identified the appellant as the one who had sold the tires to him, and qpon apprehension appellant admitted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Van Buren v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Howell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stokus v. Walled Lake School District Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980