Van Buren v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Cherry county. Tried below before Westoyer, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The plaintiffs in error, McLaughlin and Van Burén, who were defendants in the trial court, were informed against and by the verdict of a jury found guilty of stealing a mare of the value of $15, the personal property of one John Ray; the larceny charged being alleged to have been committed in Cherry county. After the overruling of a motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment, the defendants were sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a period of seven and five years, respectively, and adjudged to pay the costs of prosecution. By proceedings in error the defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
- Beal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fugate Ex Rel. McArthur v. RoninNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. O'KELLYNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Rorerts v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Callies v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Application of NeudeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.