State v. Hernandez
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Samson, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
A confession may not be used in a criminal prosecution if it was obtained through police coercion rather than voluntarily made. The appellant, who was convicted of first degree murder, argues that his confession was not voluntary, because he was still under the influence of the methamphetamine he smoked the day before. Because we find no police coercion, we conclude it was voluntary.
The appellant also claims that prior to his confession, he did not voluntarily waive his right to remain silent, but instead invoked that right during his interview with law…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. SwindleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. FiguresNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. MartinezNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. StricklinNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. MabiorNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.