Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Elliott

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1894No. 18265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is a proceeding under a writ of mandate, sued out by appellant to command respondent, as county clerk of the county of Merced, to issue to him, the said appellant, a certificate showing and certifying to his attendance in and upon the superior court in and for said county of Merced as a trial juror, and that he is entitled to pay for fifty-one days, and to like pay for one mile travel as such juror.

*319The cause was submitted upon the petition, answer, and agreed statement upon which the court below found in favor of respondent, and entered judgment discharging an alternative writ…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Birch v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hilton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Mason v. CulbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Hastie v. LampingWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Emmer v. BostockMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API