Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hastie v. Lamping

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1901No. 3896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Dunbar, J.

The agreed statement of facts in this case discloses that the jurors were on the regular panel duly and regularly summoned and qualified during the years 1897 to 1899, inclusive, and were subject to serve as jurors on Saturdays, hut had not received pay from the county for their attendance on the Saturdays when they had been excused hy the court, it appearing that, it had been the custom ordinarily to excuse the jurors from attendance upon the court from Rriday evening until Monday morning at 9:30 o’clock. On the 7th day of January, 1901, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. CulbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Jacobs v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In re WoffendenArizona Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ryan Rocha v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API