Legal Opinion

Innis v. Boller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1923No. 14661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

In this case the plaintiff in error, or plaintiff in the trial court, brought this action in the district court of -Choctaw county against W. O. Innis and others for a balance due under the terms and conditions of a certain written contract and under the terms and conditions of a subsequent oral contract.

It is admitted by all the parties that they entered into a written contract by, the terms of which the plaintiff was to drill a well for oil and gas for a stipulated amount of $6 per foot, and that in the event favorable formations should be encountered at 2,000 feet,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Bannon v. C. Aultman & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Felkner v. WinninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Wiggin v. GoodwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
  5. Marshall v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black v. WickettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Francis v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. National Loan & Exchange Bank v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API