Francis v. Hamra

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The plaintiff in e>rror was the plaintiff and the defendant in error defendant below, and they will be referred to as they appeared in tbe lower •court.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged, in) substance, that on the 30th day of October, 1922, tbe defendant stated to him that he, the defendant, owned an oil and gas lease, describing tbe same; that defendant owed soime money on tbe purchase price and if tbe plaintiff would help him pay the same that plaintiff should have! andl own a joint interest in said lease, to wit: an undivided l-32nd interest; that plaintiff accepted tbe…