United States v. Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
This..subproceeding is before the Court pursuant to the request of. the Makah Indian Tribe (the “Makah”) to determine the usual and accustomed fishing grounds (“Ü & A”) of the . Quileute Indian Tribe (the “Quileute”) and the Quinault Indian Nation (the “Quinault”), to the extent not specifically determined by Judge Hugo Boldt in Final Decision # 1 of this case. The Court is specifically asked to determine the western boundaries of the U & As of the Quileute and Quinault…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023