Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 9, 2015No. C70-9213; Subproceeding No. 09-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM ORDER

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

This..subproceeding is before the Court pursuant to the request of. the Makah Indian Tribe (the “Makah”) to determine the usual and accustomed fishing grounds (“Ü & A”) of the . Quileute Indian Tribe (the “Quileute”) and the Quinault Indian Nation (the “Quinault”), to the extent not specifically determined by Judge Hugo Boldt in Final Decision # 1 of this case. The Court is specifically asked to determine the western boundaries of the U & As of the Quileute and Quinault…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  3. United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API