Legal Opinion

Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of Washington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2024No. 23-35066PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF No. 23-35066 INDIANS, D.C. Nos. Petitioner-Appellant, 2:17-sp-00003- v. RSM 2:70-cv-09213- STATE OF WASHINGTON; UPPER RSM SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, OPINION Respondents-Appellees, TULALIP TRIBES; NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE, Intervenors-Appellees, HOH INDIAN TRIBE; SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE; MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE; SUQUAMISH TRIBE; SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE; SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE; PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, Interested Party-Appellees. 2 STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Brown v. PlataSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API