Legal Opinion

Naughton v. Vion

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Annie Naughton and another, as executors, against Ann Vion and others, to redeem certain premises in the city of New York from a sale under a foreclosure of mortgage, and to set aside a judgment of foreclosure and sale. From an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant Bridget M. Dooley appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

In February^ 1874, one James Naughton, being the owner of the premises in question, mortgaged the same to one James Dooley, to secure the payment of $3,250. After Naughton had made the mortgage, he conveyed the premises covered by the mortgage to John E. Naughton, who, in turn, conveyed them to Eliza Naughton. Dooley assigned the bond and mortgage to a man by the name of Wallace, who commenced an action to foreclose said mortgage. At this time Eliza Naughton was the owner of the fee. She was made a party defendant to the foreclosure suit, and was served with the summons, together with a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Hatch v. . Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Hogan v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  2. Brenen v. NorthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. McArthur v. SouthardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Manhattan Beach Co. v. BonnerNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API