Legal Opinion

Nemchik v. Riggs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 2016No. S16A1106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

Appellants George and Tennie Nemchik and appellee Tony Michael Riggs own adjoining property in Cobb County The Nemchiks claim an easement across a heavily wooded portion of Riggs’s property that the parties refer to as “Lot 9,” while Riggs, who has plans to develop Lot 9, denies the existence of an easement. When the Nemchiks started cutting down trees on Lot 9 and posted notices on the property, Riggs filed a lawsuit to settle the dispute, and the trial court eventually entered an interlocutory injunction barring both parties from going on Lot 9 for any purpose during the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. SRB Investment Services, LLLP v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Johnson v. Hall & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Rhodes v. Anchor Rode Condominium Homeowner's Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Allgood Farm, LLC v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Gray Lumber Co. v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TMX Finance Holdings, Inc. v. Drummond Financial Services, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. TMX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC v. DRUMMOND FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API