Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hall & Brother

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1889PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Practice. Bonds. Injunction. Before Judge Atkinson. Appling superior court. March term, 1889. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Johnson filed his petition against Hall & Brother, alleging'that they were trespassing upon a certain lot of land to which he claimed title, and that they were boxing the trees thereon for turpentine purposes. Upon hearing the case, the court enjoined the defendants, and required Johnson, the plaintiff, to give a bond according to the act approved Oct. 13th, 1885. Acts, 1884-5, p. 93. It seems from this record that, shortly after this injunction was granted restraining the defendants from cutting the trees on the disputed lot of land, Johnson, the plaintiff, hired a large…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Murphey v. HarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Camp v. Dixon, Mitchell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Rice v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Reid v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Weaver v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API