International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Franklin W. Nix
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEWIN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves a crucial issue of federalism: under what circumstances
may a federal court enjoin a proceeding in a state court? Our analysis turns on the applicability to the suit before us of the pivotal law in this area, the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283:
A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.
This court has reviewed various aspects of the dispute between Nix and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- C. A. Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Leroy JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.