Price v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentDickson, Justice
The essence of the majority opinion is that a person facing arrest who protests by screaming vulgar profanities into the face of an arresting officer does not violate Indiana’s disorderly conduct statute prohibiting unreasonable noise. I strenuously disagree. In an apparent desire to give vitality to Art. 1, § 9, of the Indiana Constitution independent of its federal counterpart, the majority has chosen an ill-suited case and formulated a strained rationale. Today’s decision is contrary to the inten*968tions and values of those who framed and ratified our constitution.
The majority’s conclusion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Tucker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Bishop v. State ex rel. GrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Kirkpatrick v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- McAnalley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.