Legal Opinion
Sun Co. v. Slamans (In Re Slamans)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 1992No. 19-01008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STEPHEN J. COVEY, Chief Judge.
This matter comes on to be heard upon an interpleader complaint filed by Sun Company, Inc. (“Sun Company”) asking that this Court determine who is entitled to $111,053.41 in its possession. Cross Motions for Summary Judgment were filed by CCF, Inc., (“CCF”) and First National Bank of Okmulgee (“FNB”). Summary judg ment is proper when there is no genuine issue of materia] fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex v. Catrett, All U.S. 817, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Upon review of the briefs of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Photo Mechanical Services, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. (In Re Photo Mechanical Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- McAllister Towing v. Ambassador Factors, Division Fleet Factors Corp. (In Re Topgallant Lines, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1993
- CCF, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Slamans)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- In Re SlamansCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- CCF, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Okmulgee (In Re Slamans)District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1994