Escanaba & Land Superior Railroad Co. v. Keweenaw Land Association
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P.J.
Is a property owner, whose land is unsuccessfully sought to be condemned by a third party under the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act, 1 entitled to reimbursement of attorney fees and expenses pursuant to § 16 of that act, MCL 213.66; MSA 8.265(16), where the condemnation action was dismissed because of the legal insufficiency of the proceedings but the court had not expressly found "the proposed acquisition improper”? If the answer to this question is "yes,” are attorney fees and expenses of in-house legal counsel recoverable? The questions raised are of first impression.
Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Central Transport, Inc. v. Fruehauf Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Detroit v. Michael's PrescriptionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- State, by Head v. SavageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re Acquisition of Land for the Central Industrial Park ProjectMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Lenawee County v. WagleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Solution Source, Inc. v. LPR Associates Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Detroit International Bridge Co. v. Commodities Export Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- New Properties, Inc v. George D Newpower, Jr, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.