Everitt, Michael Paul

OPINION

in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, KEASLER, HERVEY, COCHRAN, and ALCALÁ, JJ„ joined.

A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated. At trial, the state sought to introduce videotape evidence of appellant’s admission that he had ingested hydrocodone earlier that day, along with expert testimony about the effects of combining hydrocodone and alcohol. Appellant objected but, after a hearing on the objection, the trial court allowed the state to introduce the videotape evidence and the expert testimony.

After trial, appellant appealed, arguing inter alia, that “the trial court…