Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Walton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1980No. 80-38Published

1Dissent · PurtleJohn I. Purtle, Justice

The majority correctly stated the facts and law in this case; however, from that point on I am in disagreement with the opinion.

I think the first thing to look at is the applicable state law. In this case it is Ark. Stat. Ann. § 60-406 (Repl. 1971) which states in pertinent part as follows:. . a will, or any part thereof, can be revoked only

a. By subsequent will; or

b. By being . . . obliterated . . . with the intent and for the purpose of revoking the same, by the testator himself . . .

The plain, clear, unambiguous terms of the above statute allow a person to destroy a will or obliterate any…

Also in this document: Dissent · Stroud.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. JeffettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Walpole v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Jeffett v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API