Dodson v. Walton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent · PurtleJohn I. Purtle, Justice
The majority correctly stated the facts and law in this case; however, from that point on I am in disagreement with the opinion.
I think the first thing to look at is the applicable state law. In this case it is Ark. Stat. Ann. § 60-406 (Repl. 1971) which states in pertinent part as follows:. . a will, or any part thereof, can be revoked only
a. By subsequent will; or
b. By being . . . obliterated . . . with the intent and for the purpose of revoking the same, by the testator himself . . .
The plain, clear, unambiguous terms of the above statute allow a person to destroy a will or obliterate any…
Also in this document: Dissent · Stroud.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. JeffettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Walpole v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Jeffett v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927