Legal Opinion

Walpole v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1973No. 5-6198PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Lillie Walpole brings this appeal from a judgment of a probate court holding that certain attempted deletions in one paragraph of a purported will of Lovie Harris were ineffective because the result of eliminating the words stricken would increase the estate that appellant would take. She asserts two points for reversal: first, that the holographic will requires no attestation, and, second, that the “strike outs” and obliterations made by the testatrix on her will operate only as a revocation of the parts stricken and obliterated without the necessity of any…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arendt v. ArendtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Mason v. BowenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Smith v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Hanel v. SpringleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Anthony v. College of the OzarksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Huffman v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Smith v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Faith v. SingletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Speers v. SpeersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API