Walpole v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Lillie Walpole brings this appeal from a judgment of a probate court holding that certain attempted deletions in one paragraph of a purported will of Lovie Harris were ineffective because the result of eliminating the words stricken would increase the estate that appellant would take. She asserts two points for reversal: first, that the holographic will requires no attestation, and, second, that the “strike outs” and obliterations made by the testatrix on her will operate only as a revocation of the parts stricken and obliterated without the necessity of any…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arendt v. ArendtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Mason v. BowenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Smith v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Hanel v. SpringleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Anthony v. College of the OzarksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Huffman v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Smith v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Faith v. SingletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Speers v. SpeersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.