Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Prude

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 12, 1924No. 272PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

The writ of error was improvidently granted and must be dismissed. The application for the writ of certiorari is granted. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592. Act September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726; Jud. Code, § 237.

Respondent purchased from petitioner a round-trip coupon ticket issued at its. office in Forrest City, Ark., which authorized her to travel over its line to Texarkana, Ark., thence over the Texas Pacific Railroad to Longview, Tex., and from the latter point over the International & Great Northern Railroad to Houston, Tex., and return via the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Thompson v. MinnisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Horelick v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Grand Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Berry v. Penna. RR Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API