Legal Opinion

Omega Oil Co. v. Weschler

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to continue a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

This is a motion to continue, during the pend-ency of this action, a temporary injunction heretofore granted herein, restraining the defendants from using the words “ Omega Oil ” or the word “ Omega ” as a designation of any soap; or from advertising or representing its soap as composed of “ Omega Oil ” as one of its constituents; or from using such words in con*442neetion with any wrapper or box in which soap is packed, or from selling or exposing for sale any soap packed in a green box or package. It appears from the papers that the plaintiff is the manufacturer of a liniment known as “ Omega…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fischer v. . BlankNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. MindlinNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Northwestern Knitting Co. v. GaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Smith-Kline & French Co. v. American Druggists SyndicateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Seybold Baking Co. v. Derst Baking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Nashua Mfg. Co. v. Cohen-Fein Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API