State v. Steen
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Duane F. Steen (“Steen”) appeals from a district court order vacating a Rule 35(b), N.D.R.Crim.P., reduction in sentence. We conclude the district court act ed beyond the 120-day period permitted by Rule 35(b); therefore, the district court did not have the power to reduce Steen’s criminal sentence. The district court order vacating Steen’s sentence reduction is affirmed.
I
[¶ 2] Steen pled guilty to three charges of possession of a controlled substance, class C felonies; simple assault, a class C felony; delivery of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), a class AA…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albrecht v. Metro Area AmbulanceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. NaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Bland v. Commission on Medical CompetencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- DeCoteau v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Grand Forks v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Rahn v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.