Legal Opinion

State v. Steen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2003No. 20020355-20020360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Duane F. Steen (“Steen”) appeals from a district court order vacating a Rule 35(b), N.D.R.Crim.P., reduction in sentence. We conclude the district court act ed beyond the 120-day period permitted by Rule 35(b); therefore, the district court did not have the power to reduce Steen’s criminal sentence. The district court order vacating Steen’s sentence reduction is affirmed.

I

[¶ 2] Steen pled guilty to three charges of possession of a controlled substance, class C felonies; simple assault, a class C felony; delivery of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), a class AA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. Metro Area AmbulanceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bland v. Commission on Medical CompetencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. DeCoteau v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Grand Forks v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Rahn v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API