Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Commercial Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1903No. 4624PublishedCited by 7 opinions

' Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — -Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge.

1Per curiam

— This is an action for revival of a judgment. On motion of defendants, the cause was dismissed by the lower court. When the plaintiff made his motion and petition for revival of the judgment, the court required him to give a cost bond, on the ground that plaintiff had removed from the state of Washington subsequently to the obtaining of the judgment, and the judgment from which this appeal was taken was rendered against the plaintiff and the sureties on said bond. The respondents move to dismiss the appeal, for the reason, among others, that no notice of appeal was given to or served upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cline v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Carstens v. GustinWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Billings v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long Bell Lumber Co. v. GastonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Brockway v. AbbottWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gamble v. Alder Group Mining & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Deno v. Standard Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API