Deno v. Standard Furniture Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentMillard, J.
When the law and the precedents conflict, the courts should follow the law. Where the law and the precedents are in harmony each with the other, surely, along such a well-defined road the court should have no difficulty in proceeding.
Section 4, chapter 61, Laws 1893, p. 120, Rem. Rev. Stat., §1719 [P. C. § 7293], provides that an appeal may be taken by giving notice in open court at the time the judgment or order, from which the appeal is taken, is rendered or made; or by serving written notice on the prevailing party or his attorney within the time elsewhere (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1718 [P. C.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Cline v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Peck v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1913
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.