Hahn v. Miller
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Muscatine District Court. Action at law to recover damages resulting from a nuisance, and asking for an abatement thereof under Code, section 3331. There was a judgment upon a verdict for defendant; plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, J.'
i. practice: tíoíis: tlmeioi ccmslrueaíute I. Defendant moved to strike from the record) and abstract the bill of exceptions, upon the ground that it was not filed in the District Court and made a part of the record within the time required by law. It is shown by the abstract that judgment was rendered. in the court below on the 18th day of May, 1881, and the plaintiff was allowed sixty days in which to settle the bill of exceptions. It is made to appear by a certificate of the clerk that the District Court adjourned on the 21st of the same month. The bill of exceptions was signed by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. HockmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Claggett v. GraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Lloyd v. BeadleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
3Cited by10 opinions
- Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Lynch v. KleindolphSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Ricker v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.