Legal Opinion
Morgan v. City of Ardmore Ex Rel. Love & Thurmond
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 29, 1938No. 27916PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
The city of Ardmore, on the relation of Love & Thurmond, owners of two paving bonds, brought this action to foreclose the bonds. Three owners of separate properties in the paving district were made parties defendant, and default judgment was, on November 27, 1935, rendered against all defendants. An execution was issued on December 16, 1935. In January, 1936, the property was sold to Love & Thurmond, the sale confirmed by the court, and a sheriff’s deed issued to the purchasers. On January 27, 1936, Love & Thurmond conveyed the property to Oco Rogers.
On 'April 24, 1936, Alice Morgan, who was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. BrignardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Marks v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Morgan v. KarcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Arnold v. JoinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Service Feed Co. v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Wilkin v. Shell Oil Co. Shell Oil Co. v. WilkinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Dwyer v. Le Flore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- French v. Sotheby & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.