Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Karcher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1921No. 10069PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by A. R. Morgan against M. S. Karcher and others. Judgment for plaintiff vacated on petition of Karcher and another, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

On November 18, 1914, A. R. Morgan commenced suit in the district court of Creek county against R. J. Hill, J. 5. Baldwin, M. S. Karcher, E. W. Coulter, Edgar Udan, Fred Pennington, and Paul M. Pope, to recover the sum of $1,572 for drilling a well upon a certain oil and gas’lease owned by Hill and Baldwin, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien which had been filed agáinst said leasehold estate. On the 18th day oí November, 1914, summons was issued and served upon all of the defendants except Paul M. Pope.

On December 16, 1914, there was filed a disclaimer, signed by Udan and Pennington,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Jefferson v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Oklahoma City v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Graff v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Morgan v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API