Legal Opinion

Maxxim Rebuild Co. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 13, 2017No. 16-3530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

At issue is whether Maxxim Rebuild Company, which operates a shop that makes and repairs mining equipment, is a “coal or other mine” subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Administration. 30 U.S.C. § 802(h). The Maxxim facility does not ex tract coal or any other mineral, and it does not prepare coal or any other mineral for use. It builds and repairs mining equipment at a site that is neither adjacent to nor part of a working mine. Because the definition of “coal or other mine” refers to locations, equipment and other things in, above,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Gutierrez v. AdaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Bush & Burchett, Inc. v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor the Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Secretary of Labor v. KC Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  2. Secretary of Labor v. KC Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API