Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1947No. 31464PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is well settled that questions of diligence and negligence are ordinarily questions peculiarly within the province of the jury to determine. Meriwether County v. Gilbert, 42 Ga. App. 500 (156 S. E. 472); Powers v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 48 Ga. App. 47 (172 S. E. 84); Chisholm v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 57 Ga. 28. Under the allegations of the amended petition, it being specifically alleged that the defendant had actual knowledge of the defective condition of the plaintiff’s gas furnace, we think that it was for a jury to determine from the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Meriwether County v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Cornett v. Georgia Public Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Powers v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Belk-Matthews Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. City of Albany v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API